The events of the Pace case occurred within the context of inter-war British crime, media and police history, the study of which has been rapidly expanding in recent years.
I am very pleased to be able to announce that a special issue of Media History
edited by myself and Paul Knepper -- "Criminality, Policing and the
Press in Inter-war European and Transatlantic Perspectives" -- has now
left the printers (which I can confirm since I received my copy today).
The
four main articles (access to which will require an institutional
subscription, probably through a university) consider a variety of
topics:
In "Rogues of the Racecourse: Racing Men and the Press in Interwar Britain", Heather Shore (Leeds
Metropolitan) considers the often dramatic (and sometimes violent)
world of racecourse gangs and their presentation in both the serious and
sensationalist newspaper press. (Among those gangs considered in the
article are then then-infamous Sabinis, who have featured recently in
fictional form in the hit British television show Peaky Blinders.)
In "Two Suspicious Persons: Norwegian Narratives and Images of a Police Murder Case, 1926-1950", Per Jørgen Ystehede
(University of Oslo) takes a cross-media look at a case of police
murder that, although legendary within Norway, has yet to be given the
attention it deserves outside of that national context. Featuring stills
from the 1949 feature film based on the case (which was banned in 1952
and not shown again until 2007), the article locates the Norwegian
discourse around the case both within national and broader European
trends involving perceptions of crime.
My own article, "The Constables and the 'Garage Girl': The Police, the Press, and the Case of Helene Adele",
considers the controversy that arose when two London Metropolitan
Police constables arrested a young woman for alleged disorder in the
summer of 1928. She accused the constables of attempting to sexually
assault her and use false charges to discredit her story, leading to a
trial (and the eventual conviction) of the two men. Placed within the
context of the period's sensationalist press and a long series of police
scandals, the case has much to say about the complexities of "human
interest" journalism in the 1920s.
Paul Knepper (University of Sheffield), in "International Criminals: The League of Nations, the Traffic in Women and the Press", explores one
of the lesser known aspects of the League's activities in the inter-war
period: the campaign against the traffic in women (previously known as
"white slavery"). An important stage in the evolution of the modern
language of "human trafficking", the League's investigations and reports
were not only given widespread coverage but served as an important
justification for the international organisation's existence.
In addition, Paul and I present an introductory essay
(access to this is FREE) that explores some European and transatlantic
contexts of recent crime-and-media historiography, which has--certainly
for the inter-war period--become a very active field in recent years.
The
special issue had its origins in a session of the 2012 European Social
Science History Conference in Glasgow that I organised, though there
have been a few twists and turns since then.
It has
been a great experience to work with such talented colleagues who are,
truly, not only engaged in some fascinating research but also capable of
framing their work in clear and vivid language.
Furthermore, it was a very positive experience working with Media History, and we are all quite happy with the result.
Should anyone be interested in a copy of these essays but not have access to them through their institution, please do contact me. (Drafts of the introductory essay and my own article are available via my academia.edu page).
[Cross-posted at Obscene Desserts]
Information about the new book by John Carter Wood about the 1928 "Fetter Hill Mystery" and discussions about crime and the media in 1920s Britain.
Monday, 13 October 2014
Monday, 28 July 2014
"Quite simply an absorbing read"
The June issue of the English Historical Review contains a very fine review of The Most Remarkable Woman in England which is all the more enjoyable because it was written by Adrian Bingham,
who is not only one of the leading historians of the twentieth-century
British press but also someone whose own work influenced my approach to some
of the topics in my book on the Pace murder trial.
I'm particularly pleased by the review as it is attentive to a difficult problem with which I wrestled throughout the more than five years I spent researching and writing the book: how to combine an exciting story that would appeal to as broad an audience as possible (essentially anyone who is interested in real-life human drama and not overly averse to endnotes) while also maintaining enough academic street cred for my professional historian peers to still take it seriously.
Or, as Bingham puts it in his review:
Happily, he finds that I have succeeded in this effort:
At the end, Bingham raises a potential problem that was always on my mind (and which plagued my efforts to publish the book until I made contact with the wonderful people at Manchester University Press):
However, there's a very happy ending:
It goes without saying, I suppose, that I do too.
I've had a fairly detailed look at reviews of the book at this blog, and there is also a shorter and more concise reviews page if you just want to skim all the nice things that people have been saying about it.
And if you feel so inclined, please do order The Most Remarkable Woman in England from your local bookstore, from Manchester University Press or from the online retailer of your choice.
Rumour has it that you may be glad you did.
I'm particularly pleased by the review as it is attentive to a difficult problem with which I wrestled throughout the more than five years I spent researching and writing the book: how to combine an exciting story that would appeal to as broad an audience as possible (essentially anyone who is interested in real-life human drama and not overly averse to endnotes) while also maintaining enough academic street cred for my professional historian peers to still take it seriously.
Or, as Bingham puts it in his review:
What is the best way for academic historians to broaden their audience? How should they reach out to the much-sought-after ‘general reader’? One option (the Niall Ferguson or Simon Schama route) is to produce bold grand narratives and dazzle the public with new ways of looking at the ‘big picture’. An alternative, pursued here by John Carter Wood, is to narrow the scale, and to focus upon a dramatic human story, which can then be used to illuminate the period in question.
Happily, he finds that I have succeeded in this effort:
The spectacular success of Kate Summerscale’s The Suspicions of Mr Whicher (2009), based on a murder mystery that unfolded in Wiltshire in 1860, seems to have created a demand for real-life historical detective stories, and Wood has produced a pacy, scholarly and thought-provoking contribution to the genre. ...
Although this book is clearly designed to appeal beyond the academy, it will be of interest to scholars.... Firstly, it is quite simply an absorbing read. The case itself is a fascinating one, and Wood does it full justice. He writes crisply and vividly, and shows a real empathy for his protagonists, teasing out the likely motivations for their actions.... He has clearly learned well from the crime novelists, such as Agatha Christie and Dorothy Sayers, who so entertained the British public in the 1920s.
At the end, Bingham raises a potential problem that was always on my mind (and which plagued my efforts to publish the book until I made contact with the wonderful people at Manchester University Press):
There is a danger that books like this may fall between two stools. Wood is far more measured in his approach than a writer such as Summerscale, and he is too scrupulous a historian to let his imagination take him further than the evidence allows in order to entertain the reader. At the same time, some of those working in the field would undoubtedly have been interested in seeing some of the underlying themes developed further.
However, there's a very happy ending:
On its own terms, though, as a forensic historical examination of one of the decade’s most intriguing murder cases, this is an undoubted success. I hope it gets the wider readership it deserves.
It goes without saying, I suppose, that I do too.
I've had a fairly detailed look at reviews of the book at this blog, and there is also a shorter and more concise reviews page if you just want to skim all the nice things that people have been saying about it.
And if you feel so inclined, please do order The Most Remarkable Woman in England from your local bookstore, from Manchester University Press or from the online retailer of your choice.
Rumour has it that you may be glad you did.
Friday, 9 May 2014
"A murder mystery that captivated the nation"
Academic reviews, by nature, take a little while to start appearing.
I've already noted a few reviews from history journals of my last book, The Most Remarkable Woman in England: Poison, Celebrity and the Trials of Beatrice Pace which appeared at the end of last year. I've just noted that two others have appeared.
Happily, they both say very nice things about the book, though they focus on different things.
In Women's History Review, a review by Caitriona Clear is currently appearing as 'advance access' online (meaning that it hasn't yet appeared in the print version).
Clear focuses on, and largely summarises, the dramatic story aspects of the Pace case. She calls the book a 'page-turner' and observes:
Clear, however, finds my suggestion that Harry Pace may have killed himself via arsenic poisoning to be 'baffling'.
My actual argument about Harry's death is a bit different than she describes; however, this is one of those things where I would definitely encourage people to read the book and make up their own minds.
In the current issue of Crime, Media, Culture, Lucy Williams (who is herself a specialist on the history of women and crime) writes:
Many thanks to both reviewers for the careful readings and positive verdicts.
A complete list of reviews can be found here.
I've already noted a few reviews from history journals of my last book, The Most Remarkable Woman in England: Poison, Celebrity and the Trials of Beatrice Pace which appeared at the end of last year. I've just noted that two others have appeared.
Happily, they both say very nice things about the book, though they focus on different things.
In Women's History Review, a review by Caitriona Clear is currently appearing as 'advance access' online (meaning that it hasn't yet appeared in the print version).
Clear focuses on, and largely summarises, the dramatic story aspects of the Pace case. She calls the book a 'page-turner' and observes:
In telling this story, [Wood] references all the main authorities and rehearses all the arguments of gender history and British social history in the inter-war period. He does this so skilfully that there is no sense of being dragged away from the scene of the crime to listen to teacher. Nor does he shy away from speculating about what really happened to Harry Pace.
Clear, however, finds my suggestion that Harry Pace may have killed himself via arsenic poisoning to be 'baffling'.
My actual argument about Harry's death is a bit different than she describes; however, this is one of those things where I would definitely encourage people to read the book and make up their own minds.
In the current issue of Crime, Media, Culture, Lucy Williams (who is herself a specialist on the history of women and crime) writes:
John Carter Wood's The Most Remarkable Woman in England may at first seem little more than historical coverage of a real-life whodunit mystery, but this impressive scholarly work quickly shows the trial of Beatrice Pace to be a landmark court case--socially, culturally, and legally. ...
In a fascinating display of meticulously collected evidence, Wood at first draws the reader in to ask 'who killed Harry Pace?', but the real triumph of this book is the seamless way in which the author unravels the social and cultural impact of the case as the evidence and hearsay surrounding the murder mounted.
Quickly, The Most Remarkable Woman in England becomes not about the guilt or innocence of Beatrice Pace in the death of her husband, but a series of more complex questions for the reader to consider. These relate both to situating the case as a product of its time and in thus reading its significance, and also in evaluating the role which the media played in constructing well-defined personae for both harry and Beatrice Pace, as well as the extent to which this influenced public reaction to the trial. ...
In analysing the Pace case, John Carter Wood offers an in-depth exploration of attitudes towards inter-war crime, gender, media sensation and criminal justice, and at the same time delivers a comprehensive overview of a murder mystery that captivated the nation.
Many thanks to both reviewers for the careful readings and positive verdicts.
A complete list of reviews can be found here.
Saturday, 1 February 2014
Own a piece of Pace-case history...for only about £3 million
It has been announced that Gloucester Prison is now up for sale.
As the Gloucester Citizen reported today:
Among other illustrious guests, Beatrice Pace was held in the prison during her trial in Gloucester in July 1928.
Here is an aerial image of the prison, coincidentally also taken in 1928, which also shows the Shire Hall, where the trial was held.
It's certainly a rather different way of getting on the property ladder.
As the Gloucester Citizen reported today:
As a 3.5-acre brownfield site it could be worth more than £3million but its unique character could drive the price down – 122 bodies lie beneath it and its uses could be constrained by its history.
The Debtors’ Prison became a cell block on the west side and is Grade II listed, meaning the interior is protected too.
The oldest part, which retains features from the 1791 prison, is also listed.
Among other illustrious guests, Beatrice Pace was held in the prison during her trial in Gloucester in July 1928.
Here is an aerial image of the prison, coincidentally also taken in 1928, which also shows the Shire Hall, where the trial was held.
Source: Britain from Above |
It's certainly a rather different way of getting on the property ladder.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)